I've had a lot of time on my hands recently to delve deeply (that is deeper than I usually would) into the massive amount of information the internet has to offer. I researched mostly the studies that have been done over the past few decades to support homosexuality as a biological (possibly even genetic) disposition. I'm not going to quote what I read, or the videos I watched, but instead just lay out my own views based on the stuff I found out.

Note - There is a difference between genes and human biology. To say something is genetic is to say it was inherited from the parents or other family during conception in the womb. A biological trait obtained during conception is one the fetus creates it's self. It's the very reason we don't look exactly like mom, or exactly like dad or have a personality like any other human. It's also very complex and one of the those great mysteries of life. The process that occurs causing no two humans to be the same (even identical twins are only identical to certain extents).

1. There is SIGNIFICANT proof of homosexuality in males AND females being biological. I'm sure most of you have heard or read about the area in the brain that is one way in males, and a completely different way in females. In gay males, this area is identical to straight females. In lesbian females, this area is very close to that of straight males, but not as identical. If you take these facts into consideration, then the statistic that in a large population of people , 4-5 percent are gay males and 2-4 percent are lesbian females, it starts to make sense. There is a period of weeks in a fetus's life where it's gender is determined. Testosterone is present in all these cases... in high amounts in male fetuses, and low amounts in female fetuses. There is scientific proof that regardless of whether the fetus is male, or female, the amount of testosterone present will play a part in the determination of sexual orientation. Take a male fetus for example with a low presence of testosterone (like a female fetus would typically have) and your result is almost always going to be a gay male. Add just a tad more testosterone, but not necessarily as much as a straight male would have and your result is a bisexual male, or at least.. a more effeminate male with characteristics similar to those of a female (though he is purely attracted to females, he shares neurological and physical traits of the female gender). I didn't pull this out of my ass people, it's fact. And the studies are only getting better, and more precise as the years pass.

2. Now why the fuck isn't this information being distributed to the population to help people understand homosexuality better and have better acceptance? Well my friends, it's because of a little thing called religion and the book known as the bible.. (jumble those letters up and take out the b's and what word do you have? LIE.) To show this proof of homosexuality being a biological human trait (just like brown eyes or pale skin) would be to deny God in the eyes of MOST people on this planet. This isn't limited to the most common religions or their "books of code" as it were either. Of the millions of cultures on this planet, I challenge you to find even 10 that don't think people of the same gender should not sleep together or be in love. In my mind, I first think of the bible though because it's the only religious book I've ever had anyone try to cram down my throat. It's the only book I have ever seen turn an open minded person into such a fucking religious nut case that every bad or good thing they experienced in life was either credited to "GOD and JESUS" or blamed on "GOD and JESUS". A great example of a flaw in the bible that I actually discovered on my own is the areas talking about the anti-christ and the second coming of Jesus. While it first states that these two people will come to earth at some point, it also warns you never to believe anyone who says they are one of these things. It ALSO says these people will reveal themselves vocally (it mentions other ways as well). Of course you are going to tell people never to believe anyone who says they are Jesus.. because even then it was known how people would get so fanatical about the bible they would have visions of grandeur until they went crazy and thought they themselves were Jesus. I have a better understanding of this flaw in my mind that is hard to explain but it has to do with psychology mostly.To say  "Jesus WILL come" calms the fanatics (to say the antichrist will come scares the fuck out of them so they follow willingly and don't argue).. but "don't believe anyone who says they are Jesus" buys the bible plenty of time, possibly as long as humans exist to lay down the rules for all the sheep who will believe it. As far as spirituality goes, the wisest and what seems like the most probable way to be "religious" if you want to use that word is to understand WHO you are as a person, and as a soul in a temporary body. Forget all material items. Forget TV, forget rules, forget the goverment, forget organized religion. Just feel you... not on the outside, but on the inside.. and sit in the outdoors and feel the souls around you. The ones in other humans, in animals, and even those in the creatures so small you can't see them. Feel the soul in the land around you, the planet turning under you, and the universe surrounding you. Understand and be open to the possibility that there are souls amongst you taking a form on a different dimension your five senses cannot even perceive. And there, you have MY idea of a good religion. No words, no rules, no judgement... just feeling from deep inside.. not from your sense of touch or your ability to read a book or be easily mislead by authority figures (the pope OR the president).

3. So let's say this science of nature was brought to light. I see two outcomes in my mind, neither of which is good. Because I believe the human body and the way it works is just a vessel.. I don't believe it should be tampered with unless it is obstructing a soul's happiness. In other words, if you're deformed and people are making fun of you.. then by all means, tamper away until you feel good about your vessel. After all, our soul may be massive but it is confined to a human body with a human brain while we are here (unless we are a soul NOT in a human), and our low capacity minds (minds too small to reveal the full potential of our souls) cause the deep seeded need to be accepted on the outside. So, that makes the first possible result of the wide distribution of this scientic evidence, a very bad one. In the world of medicine, theoretically, if you knew what CAUSED homosexulity, you could then find a CURE right? Every fanatically religious person in the world would jump on this. The very people who preach "accept who you are, god made you" would contradict their beliefs. They would still hate homosexuality so much that they would be willing to inject fetuses with drugs to hinder the development (or stop the development) of a homosexual human being. And this would snowball into a huge crisis. Women who could not afford these drugs would simply abort, which is also going against their "God". The chaos that would ensue from trying to stop or cure homosexuality would be another haulocost. Hitler wanted only blonds with blue eyes. The religiously dominated society we live in would mold into one big hitler.. and gay people would be slaughtered on sight. If you were caught aiding the homos.. you'd be destroyed too. It could be no other way to these people. For humanity's sake, I hope THIS would not be the outcome. My other theory would be a great divide. Not so much a murderous rampage of torch and pitch fork weilding christians and catholics running amuck, but a war between the free (free in will and free in mind) and the brainwashed. While many would accept the evidence and no longer care one way or another about sexual orientation, a vast amount of people would be in denial.. stamp satan's name on it, and run away. Would we put up a wall between each other? How would we even share the world anymore? Would we elect two goverments? One for straight god fearing people and one for gay and straight spiritual open minded people? Who would end up on top?

It is inevitable sooner or later (my money is on sooner) this proof and evidence will be too hard and factual to deny and the scientists and doctors who founded it will want to openly share it. It just boggles my mind to think of how our world (especially our country) will react. Because it is going to disprove things in the bible and bring to light even more of that book's complete bullshit, it's going to start a country wide riot. I can skepticize all day but it's something no one can know until it happens. Up to this point, all you see about this on TV is a shitty news station saying "Homosexuals: Are they born this way? Hairy Dicks is here to lay out the facts. Stay tuned." And what does Hairy Dicks say? Well he sits right there and lies through his teeth that it's all bullshit and strokes the egos of the millions of people who think gay people are going to hell without actually paraphrasing the bible. Mr. Dicks carefully scripted dialogue (probably written by the goverment) is a crystal clear example of why you can't trust the media. You can't trust TV, the news, magazines, or anything in a news paper you don't already know is a fact. But most humans with their dimly lit upstairs lights buy into all of this bullshit and build a life around it. I often rant about the people who stroll around with their cellphones always in hand and caring more about the brand of clothing they are wearing than a loved one or a friend. These people are cookie cutter examples of media children. I just made that title up. Media children are just people who have become so wrapped up in what all the different media outlets say a good life should be, that they become the media's own walking talking advertisements. They believe in the bible because the media says so, they buy an iphone because the media says so, they buy abercrombie and fitch because the media says so, they like athletic jock boys because the media says so, they like Jessica Simpson's music because the media says so, they get a yorkshire terrier puppy because the media says so. Now think of the people you know who AREN'T Media children. Do they like/do any of this shit? I didn't think so. (Nerds are excluded from the cellphone issue because a) us nerds love our technology and b) nerds know apple sucks ass. and if you like apple..well.. ewww.)

Just a whole crap load of food for your head there. I'd love some comments on this blog, or some emails. I'm always up for a good debate on this type of stuff.

/logout